Object: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

CHAP. viii] RELATIONS OF THE HOUSES 577 
& strong feeling in the Colony that the practice of making 
appointments before vacating office was not ome which 
New Zealand Governments should be encouraged to follow. 
In a democratic country punishment follows on wrong advice 
through the action of the people, and it was not necessary for 
the Governor to take such a strong step as refusing advice. 
In a dispatch of April 11, 1891! Lord Knutsford said :— 
With regard to the appointments to the Legislative 
Council recommended by the late Government, I am of 
opinion that, in accepting the advice tendered to you by 
your Lordship’s responsible ministers, under the circum- 
stances described in your dispatches, you acted strictly in 
accordance with the “constitution of the Colony, but I do 
not desire to be understood to offer any opinion upon the 
action of your ministers in tendering such advice. 
On June 22, 18922 Lord Glasgow reported that his 
ministers desired to increase the Legislative Council by 
twelve members, while he himself was prepared to concede 
the appointment of nine. They had a good majority in the 
House of Representatives, but in the Legislative Council the 
Attorney-General, the only minister in that Chamber, had 
only four or five members to help him. 
Mr. Ballance did not wish to swamp the Council, but only 
bo have a certain amount of debating power there. Lord 
Glasgow was willing to concede nine members ; if he con- 
ceded more he would run the risk of making the Council 
a mere echo of the other House ; if it were to have no opinion 
of its own it was of no use, but if it preserved its liberty 
and gave the country time to reconsider questions it might 
be of invaluable service to the Colony. In a telegraphic 
reply of August 10, 1892.2 Lord Knutsford pointed out that 
bhe Council consisted of thirty-one Opposition members and 
five of the Ministry, while if twelve were added to the latter 
bhe Opposition would still remain, and therefore the proposal 
of the Premier would seem to be reasonable—the existence of 
an Upper House might be imperilled unless a more even 
balance of parties were secured. In a dispatch of August 8, 
“Parl. Pap., H. C. 198, 1893-4, p. 14. ? Thid., p. 14. 
* Ibid., p. 16. 
1979-9
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.