Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

CHAP. TV] THE GOVERNOR AS HEAD 187 
arged that they were entitled to a dissolution, as the House 
had been elected under the auspices of their rivals, and there 
was every prospect that an election would leave them in 
a substantial majority. The Governor declined, because he 
did not think there was any certainty of a change in the views 
of the country, there was no great question at issue, other 
arrangements were possible, and there was no grant of supply. 
He could not undertake to consider a dissolution unless 
supply were granted for three months. The Ministry then 
advanced the view that the power to dissolve was one resting 
on the Constitution Act, not on the prerogative, and therefore 
should be exercised on ministerial advice without regard to 
the grant of supply. The Governor rejoined that he had 
a clear discretion to dissolve under the Act, and that the 
royal instructions left him full discretion to refuse to dissolve 
despite ministers’ advice, and he refused to dissolve. Ulti- 
mately Parliament was prorogued, the usual supplies having 
been voted! A month later the Governor was again asked 
bo dissolve, but he had now come to the conclusion that it 
was not necessary to do so, as the Premier could probably 
command a majority in the next Parliament. On the other 
hand, the Premier argued that the Governor was only a 
constitutional monarch, and must dissolve on advice. The 
matter was referred to the Secretary of State for the Colonies, 
who on February 15, 1878, definitely approved the views 
taken by the Governor of his rights and his duties, while 
emphasizing his duty to consider carefully the views of his 
ministers. In July 1879 the Government, however, was de- 
feated in the House on a motion of no confidence, and the new 
Governor consented to dissolve on condition that Parliament 
should be called as soon as possible. This was agreed to, but 
both Houses addressed the Governor to secure that there 
should be no delay in summoning them, and the Governor 
then asked for an assurance from the Premier that he would 
advise the House to be summoned early? The assurance 
New Zealand Parl. Pap., 1877, A. 7; 1878, A. 1, p. 3. 
bid. A. 2, p. 14; Gazette, 1878, pp. 911-14, 
ibid., 1879, A. 1 and 2; Rusden, New Zealand, iii. 278 seq.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.