12
THE SOCIALISM OF TO-DAY.
tion, because it lessened the force of individual interest as an
incentive to work, and it did not lend itself to the varied com
binations which arise from the modern organization of trade.
“ Associated ownership ”—that is to say, the same as exists in
the modern joint-stock companies—is, according to Mario, the
form which best suits intensive production. It unites the per
manent character and the powerful means of production of
corporate ownership, to the advantages arising from the capa
bility of division and transfer, and the individual nature of
parcelled-out private property. Hence the ever-increasing part
assumed by commercial and industrial societies in the economic
world.
Mario sets forth, with remarkable analytical force, the
advantages offered by associated ownership, as well for the
increase in the productivity of labour as for the improvement
of the condition of the labourers. He did not, however, foresee
all the obstacles which, in the present state of things, prevent
its becoming as general as might have been hoped, if only the
best side, which the author throws into such bold relief, were
taken into consideration. The solution which he reaches is in
reality borrowed from Fourrier ; the Utopia of communistic
phalansteries appears from time to time as the ideal. Never
theless, he has studied Political Economy most profoundly, and
in his deductions, often very ingenious, he scarcely ever ignores
economic principles. Unlike most reformers, he insists, as
strongly as J. S. Mill, that the population question in reality
governs all others. Like Mill, or J oseph Gamier, he says :
accomplish the best imaginable reforms, spare nothing in order
to better the condition of the lower classes, adopt laws the best
calculated to further the growth of wealth and its equitable dis
tribution, yet all your efforts will be in vain, if the population
increases faster than the means of subsistence. Industry will
in vain multiply her manufactured articles ; they are merely
accessories. The essential thing to know is whether each year
agriculture can obtain from the soil sufficient produce to enable
everybody at least to be fed.
Mario is entirely right on this point, but he relies too much
upon preventive measures, which, as experience has shown,