3 22
EMPLOYMENT PSYCHOLOGY
This difficulty does not remove the necessity of forming
estimates of the capabilities of employees. On the contrary,
it makes the necessity more urgent. If the work can
not be standardized, and if the estimate of workers must
depend upon personal opinions, the next best step must be
taken. This step is to standardize the method in which
personal opinions shall be expressed, and to pursue a
course which shall reduce the chance elements in such expressions
to a minimum.
But how can the formation and expression of personal
opinions be standardized? As a matter of fact, they can
not. Certain limits or guide posts can be established which
will tend to produce a certain degree of uniformity. For
this reason, the plan suggested here is called the method
of limited impressions.
In the first place, the time at which these opinions are
to be expressed can be specified. Too often the estimate
of an employee is left until the critical minute when the
employee asks for a promotion or a release. As long as an
employee’s work goes without serious hitches, the employee
is regarded simply as a more or less useful fixture,
and no attempt is made to study him or to gauge his
capacities. When the emergency arises, an estimate must
be made in a comparatively short time and frequently
without an adequate basis of observation. If, now, at
certain stated periods, it automatically becomes the duty
of each head or manager to review carefully the work and
value of each of the workers under him, and to record this
review in a definite manner, this haphazard and fortuitous
expression of personal opinions will be largely
done away with. A formal record of such a periodic
estimate would constitute a continuous appraisal of an
employee, would tend to keep the employee’s qualities