38 COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS
TABLE 18.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets,
of producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested
IDAHO, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR THE TWO AREAS INVESTIGATED
[Excluding capital charges]

Cost per ton

Less than—
Me ece————

Na.

Farms

Number | Per cent

0.9
10.4
15.1
it
421

Acres

Number | Per cent

20.8
134.3
202.9
488. 4
661. 6
R71.(
228.

4,
11.1
16.8
40. 5
54.8

Number |

000. U
2, 5562. 1
3,831.1
8,285.9
10, 931. 6
Cc. I81.¢
921.4
350.
699.”
048. .
209. 4
28.
i. .

Tons

Per cent

21
14.4
21.7
46.9
61.9
76.9
78.8
ag 9
Q

06. 5
97.4
98.1
99.1
99. 6
99.9
100.0

TaBLE 19.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets,
of producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested
IDAHO, 1922—~COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR THE TWO AREAS INVESTIGATED
[Including capital charges]
[Land charge on net cash rental basis with interest on other capital at 6 per cent}

Cost per ton

Less than—
34,00. ce ieemecem—ee meee
* TTY co te re em re 0

10
“n

Farms

Number | Per cent |

?
1
1¢
33

0.¢
1
11.*
17.9
31.1
A

3
0

nN

105
106

Gy
99.
100. 0

Acres

Number | Per cent

20.8
24.8
146. 3
242, 9
134. 9
6.8.6
nee
36.0. 1
970. &
:

L
2.1
12.1
20.1
36.0
51.2

Number

366. 0
442.0
2,808. 1
4,476.
7,593. 1
0, 349, i
~08. ¢
46. &
“0.
3.1
).¢
6
x

Tons

Per cent

2.1
2.5
15.9
25.3
43.0
58. 6
65. 7
78.4
84.7
86. 7
91.7
94.7
97.6
08.1
08.3
98.8
99.1
99.4
99.9
100 0