64 COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS
TABLE 31.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of
producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested
UTAH, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 478 FARMS IN THE THREE
AREAS INVESTIGATED
[Excluding capital charges]

Cost per ton

aeg than—
B00. ice cm mm me Bm
AO eee
1 ee mm ccmmmm—en
oe.

r
¢
vo
ll
bee

290.01

Farms
Number | Per cent |

2
19
59
1:

0.4
4.0
12.3
23.6 |
35.4
50.8
52.1
I

2%"

-

Acres

Number

Per cent

20.0
282.0
1,004. 5
1,948.1
2,853. 6
», 799. 4
545.4
06. 4
08.4

0.4
4.2
16.3
29.0
42.5 |
RR, 6
7.7
~.0
3.8
“3.1
1.3
4
9

0.7

7

dav

Tons
Number | Per cent

466.0
4, 577.8
16,393. 4
29,740. 6
42,112. 2
55,393. 5
23,002. 7
1,713.2
77,921.4
10,908. 1
"7 875.
4, 711. £
5, 657. &
4,072.4
’, 705.
2 850. 2
010.1
247. §
348. F
425.4
614.8
714. 1
764. }
"90. €
6.1
R7. 848. 1

0.5
5.2
18.7
33.8
47.9
63.1
74.0
81.6
88.7
22.1
04.3
96.4
97.5
£0
“8.%
"9
9.1
0a. 2
09.4
99.5
99."
$9. .
99.9
99.9
99.9
100. ©

TasLE 32.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of
producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested
UTAH, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 478 FARMS IN THE THREE
AREAS INVESTIGATED
{Land charges on net cash rental basis and interest on other capital at 6 per cent]
[Including capital charges]

Cost per ton

Less tr>n—
A. Yemen mmmremmmmnn mmm
oo.
i
Ee ee re ef. ro. ms 6
oe I

Number ' Per cent

1
¢
20
4¢
~
14°
201
250
+3

0.2
.6
4.2
10.0
I>

coy

ge.
90
99.4
09. 6
99. §
100. ¢

47 4
478

Acres
Number Per cent |

32.0
54.0
212.0
333.5
£98. 5
AT

0.8
.&
R.2
12.4
ee

30.5
5 "05.3
6,708.3
6.716. 3

5.
59. ¢
09, ¢
100. f

Tons

Number Per cent

384.0
717.0
3,704.4
i2, 803.0
"4, 651. §
3, 671.1
12,163. (
408.7
30.6
76.4
09, ¢
929. ¢
. 458.4
357.
,699.
= 770."
"289.
254.
487."
£44
14

0.4
.8
4.2
14.6
28.1
41.7
54.8
64. 2
73 1
82.8
87.9
91.0
93.0
04.9
96 4
97.6
rc

dA

08.
08.9
99.1
99, 2
or 7
£7
¢.
9g.
99.9
100.0
100. 0

J2.
5.
L532.
764.
37,790. 1
37, 812. 4
37 848. 1