THE SOCIALISM OF TO-DAY.
84
of his correspondence with L#assalle, published by A. W agner,
he shows in what respect he may be called conservative.
“ Our ways of understanding law and the philosophy of history,
he writes, in speaking of Lassalle, “ were similar, in that we
did not consider the succession of social and political forms
as exhausted by the establishment of the constitutional or the
representative system. We were both convinced that, by
placing ourselves at the point of view of a philosophy of law
more ideal and rigorous than that received to-day, we should
observe imperfections in property as at present applied to land
and capital, and we should discern a form of appropriation
purer and more equitable, by virtue of which the share of
each would be proportional to services rendered. In practice
we were unable to agree," adds Rodbertus. Lassalle, as we
know, wished to change the condition of working men in a
short time, by making them join associations of production,
founded by means of State aid. I wished to preserve the
principle of wages, while supposing a reform to be undertaken
by the State. Lassalle wished to make a political party out
of the Socialist party, and for this purpose he demanded
universal suffrage. I wished to confine its action to the purely
scientific and economic ground.”
Lassalle was an ardent agitator who believed the goal
would soon be reached, while Rodbertus understood so well
the slowness of social transformations, that it was only after
the lapse of five centuries that he looked for the realization
of his ideal—property in proportion to labour. Rodbertus
approached the present “ Agrarian ” party in that he defended
energetically the agricultural interests, which he maintained
were sacrificed to the financiers. As he himself farmed his
property at Jagetzow, he, like Von Thuenen, understood
thoroughly all questions relating to rural economy, but, unlike
the “ Agrarians,” he did not hope to re-establish the régime of
times past.
The most retrograde shade of Conservative Socialism was
* Briefe von Ferdinand Lassalle an Karl Kodberíus-Jagetzow mit einer
FinUitunz von Adolph Wagner. Berlin, 1870 (Letters of F. Lassalle to
K Rodbertus-Jagetzow, with an introduction by Adolph Wagner).