THE UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES 361
cotton producers no worse than that of other Americans, and that of the
English steel producers no better than that of other Englishmen. The extent
to which the decrease of the American output of cotton will go depends on the
nature of the English demand for that article; the extent to which the increase
of English output of steel will go depends on the nature of the American demand
in turn for this. The rapidity of the changes will depend on the industrial
conditions. If the commodity is one produced with much plant — steel, for
example — no great expansion can take place except by the slow process of
addition to plant. If it is an agricultural product like cotton, grown on land
not readily turned to other crops, the process of diminution in the United States
will also be slow. Even more slow will it be if the conditions of production are
like those in the vineyards of France or the coffee plantations of Brazil. On the
other hand, a manufactured commodity made with comparatively little plant
and from raw material that is abundant — like German cutlery — will respond
quickly to the new conditions of demand and price.
Under any conditions, whether of slow or rapid changes, an intervening pe-
riod of partial and unstable adjustment is to be expected. The price of cotton,
in our illustrative case, will rise somewhat from the bottom point; the price of
steel will fall somewhat from the top point. And the quantities of the goods
passing between the two countries will shift correspondingly, less cotton
going out from the United States and more steel going out from Great Britain.
Let it be supposed, for example, that the following situation develops :!
U. S. exports 48 million cotton @ 53d. = £1,100,000
(i. B. exports 60 million steel @ $0.18 = $10,800,000
Great Britain continues to remit £250,000 on loan account. The total of ster-
ling exchange offered them becomes :
From cotton £1,100,000
From loans 250,000 . . £1,350,000
Whereas the demand (on steel account) is . «. . $10,800,000
The rate of exchange resulting from the two quantities is £1 = $8.00.
The gross barter terms of trade here are 48 cotton for 60 steel. The net
barter terms we ascertain (as before) by taking separate account of the steel
sales which serve to meet the loan remittances. In round numbers, 11 million
steel at $0.18 will supply (with exchange at $8.00) the £250,000 needed.
Deducting these 11 million from the total British export of 60 million steel,
we have, as the net barter terms of trade 49 million steel against 48 million
cotton. The net rate is less advantageous to Great Britain than at the start.
! These figures would indicate that the English demand for cotton is inelastic :
the quantity of cotton bought in London decreases but little with a rise in price from
4.8d. to 55d. They would indicate, on the other hand, that the American demand for
steel is elastic: with a fall in price from $0.20 to $0.18 the quantity of steel bought
in New York increases a great deal.