cHAp. 11] LIMITATION OF LEGISLATION 399
is necessary for the proper enforcement of the powers given.
In some cases it would be difficult to contend that these
powers can be limited to territorial limits in the strict sense
of the word. For example, the British North America Act,
1867, provides by s. 91 (7) for the Federation having power
to legislate for the peace, order, and good government of
Canada in respect of militia, military, and naval service
and defence. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of
Australia has power under the Constitution, s. 51 (vi), to
legislate for the naval and military defence of the Common-
wealth. Again, the Parliament of the Union of South
Africa has the fullest powers to legislate for the Government
of South Africa, and so also in New Zealand and New-
foundland.
In all these cases the effects of their Acts on military
subjects are extended by the Imperial Army Act, 1881, s. 177,
to have effect beyond their territorial limits in respect of
their own forces, for the Army Act only applies to them
where the Colonial Legislature has made no other pro-
vision.
It would be impossible clearly to confine within territorial
limits the effect of these laws; naval defences would be
quite ineffectual if the vessels ceased to be under any law
when they left the three-mile limit. On the other hand, if
they then fell under the Imperial Acts, which is not the case
from the wording of these Acts, then the power of legislation
given to the Dominions would cease to be a reality. It follows,
therefore, that naval defence involves extra-territorial legis-
lation, though to what extent it must be difficult to say in
view of the absence of authoritative declaration in the
Courts. Hitherto, the naval forces of the Colonies, that is to
say, of the Australian Colonies, which alone until 1910had in-
dependent naval forces, have been forces which have been in
part raised under the terms of an Imperial Act, 28 & 29 Vict.
¢. 14, and have therefore been specially provided for by Im-
perial legislation. They are now regulated, since the passing of
the Defence Acts of the Commonwealth and Canada, by their
legislation, and it is impossible to hold that that legislation