Anleiherecht, Reichsschuldenwesen, Reichsschuldbuch, Anleiheablösung, Anleihen auf Grund des Dawes-Plans, Anleihen der Reichspost und Anleihen der Schutzgebiete

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1799766322

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-185224

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Schultzenstein, Siegfried http://d-nb.info/gnd/117236365

Title:: Anleiherecht, Reichsschuldenwesen, Reichsschuldbuch, Anleiheablösung, Anleihen auf Grund des Dawes-Plans, Anleihen der Reichspost und Anleihen der Schutzgebiete

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Sieben Stäbe- Verl.- u. Dr. Ges.

Year of publication:: 1929

Scope:: LV, 326 S.

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: III. Anleiheablösung

Collection:: Economics Books

186 THE PRIVY COUNCIL. orders, Government measures take precedence on certain days and when necessary the Government take the whole time of the House for their own bills. The result is that Government bills have a much better chance of becoming law than have bills of private members. For all Government bills the Ministry is responsible. A (2) Summoning, proroguing, and dissolving Parliament. ing Parlia- he Dominion Parliament is required to meet every year’; in appointing the time of meeting the Governor-General is guided by the advice of his Ministers. The prorogation or dissolution of Parliament being an exercise of prerogative power, the Governor-General is not bound to follow their advice. In discharging the responsibility of deciding in a particular case whether a dissolution should be granted, the Governor of a Colony “will of course pay the greatest attention to any representations that may be made to him by those who at the time are his constitutional advisers: but if he should feel himself bound to take the responsibility of not following his ministers’ recommendation there can, I appre- hend, be no doubt that both law and practice empower him to lo so?” Previous to the Confederation in 1858 the Governor of the Province of Canada declined to grant a dissolution at the request of the ministry on the grounds that a new election had lately taken place, that some measures of great import- ance required to be passed, and that an election would be a great inconvenience to the Province’ Lord Mulgrave, Governor of Nova Scotia, refused a dissolution in 1860, as he thought it was neither expedient nor for the public con- venience that a dissolution should take place the year after a veneral election? LB, N. A. Act, 5. 20. 2 Despatch of Sir M. Hicks Beach to Governor of New Zealand, quoted in Todd, p. 547. 3 Todd, p. 528. 4+ Ib. p. 537.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: The Constitution of Canada

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation