The reconstruction of agriculture in the Soviet Union

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1831009781

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-221050

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Gajster, Aron I. http://d-nb.info/gnd/132986779

Title:: The reconstruction of agriculture in the Soviet Union

Place of publication:: Moscow, U. S. S. R.

Publisher:: Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Year of publication:: [1930]

Scope:: 31, [1] Seiten

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

& ® 5 £ g = C. FR so § 3 : i A 3 » > a : . : Cy NN LA oy N & sr > Ch N ~ Ie ke ot oO fe) oO [3%] -] N :hnical methods. Moreover, even wherever there are tractors as yet on the collective farms (and there still a considerable shortage of tractors, despite bir ever wider distribution throughout the agricul- 1gral areas of the U. S. 8. R.), the advantages of *ge-scale production are clearly in evidence. First of all, one must point out the increase in the , oductivity of agricultural labor as a consequence of ¢ uniting of the small peasant holdings into large lective farms. Thus the number of hectares sown r farm laborer in the collective farms has increased, comparison with the peasant holdings prior to their trance into the collective farms (in 1929): in the iraine—31.6 per cent; in the Middle Volga Region 78.1 per cent; in the Central Black Soil Region— -0 per cent; in the Lower Volga Region—178.0 per at; in the Northern Caucasus—50 per cent. At the same time, there has been a considerable 'rease in the utilization of draft cattle, which in the all peasant holdings had never been fully utilized. 1s, according to budgetary data, the percentage of aft cattle which were not used had been as follows: In the Ukraine—68.6 per cent. In the Northern Caucasus—78 per cent. In the collective farms the draft cattle have been lized much more productively than was the case the petty peasant holdings. In the Ukraine the lization of draft cattle has increased, in compari- with the peasant holdings prior to their collectivi- don (in 1929), 24.1 per cent; in the Middle Volga g1on—30 per cent; in the Central Black Soil Region 7.4 per cent; in the Lower Volga Region—25.2 per it; in the Northern Caucasus—34.6 per cent, The significant increase in the productive possibilities 21 d

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: The reconstruction of agriculture in the Soviet Union

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation