Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

A survey of the trade in rubber manufactured goods

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: A survey of the trade in rubber manufactured goods

Monograph

Identifikator:
1848834152
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-240944
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
A survey of the trade in rubber manufactured goods
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
His Majesty's Stationery Office
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
119 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
XXIV. The industry in Belgium
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • A survey of the trade in rubber manufactured goods
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • I. Introduction
  • II. Comparison of the statistics of different countries
  • III. Characteristics of the rubber industry
  • IV. Growth of the rubber manufacturing industry
  • V. Absorption in rubber in different countries
  • VI. Use of rubber in different branches of the Industry
  • VII. Reclaimed rubber
  • VIII. Motor tyre industry
  • IX. The mechanical rubber goods industry
  • X. The rubber footwear industry
  • XI. Rubber soles and heels
  • XII. Other rubber manufactures
  • XIII. The export trade of France in rubber manufactured goods
  • XIV. Summary of the foregoing analysis of export trades
  • XV. The industry in the United Kingdom
  • XVI. The industry in Canada
  • XVII. The industry in Australia
  • XVIII. The industry in other parts of the British Empire
  • XIX. The industry in the United States
  • XX. The industry in France
  • XXI. The industry in Germany
  • XXII. The industry in Japan
  • XXIII. The industry in Italy
  • XXIV. The industry in Belgium
  • XXV. Need for more uniform statistics
  • XXVI. Technical skill and labour
  • XXVII. Standardisation
  • XXVIII. Minimum prices - standard costing system
  • XXIX. Research
  • XXX. Tendencies in the rubber industry

Full text

HS 
ports of rubber heels and soles are increasing, the former chiefly 
from the United States and France; the latter chiefly to the 
United Kingdom. A smaller value of toys and games was ex- 
ported in 1928 than in 1927 and went chiefly to France and the 
Netherlands ; imports from France and the United Kingdom are 
increasing. 
Surgical rubber exports go chiefly to the Belgian Congo and 
India; imports come chiefly from Germany and France. Imports 
of miscellaneous rubber manufactures come chiefly from Germany 
and France and, to a much less degree, from the United States 
and Great Britain; exports in 1928 amounted to 548 tons against 
258 tons in 1927, Great Britain taking 211 tons and the Netherlands 
175 tons. 
Exports of sheets, plates, rods, &c. and thread, which are semi- 
manufactured goods used in further manufacture, are increasing. 
Ebonite goods, chiefly imported from Germany and France, were 
61 tons in 1927 and 88 tons in 1928 ; other sheet, &c. imported were 
227 tons in 1927 and 270 tons in 1928, 48 tons in the former year 
and 65 tons in the latter coming from Great Britain. Exports 
were less in 1928 than in 1927 and went to Germany, France, the 
Netherlands, and Italy. Exports of thread are trivial but imports 
are considerable. being in 1928 valued at £41.000. 
C.—CENERAIL CONSIDERATIONS. 
XXV.—NEED FOR MORE UNIFORM STATISTICS. 
116. At this point we should like to call attention once more to 
the need for more uniform statistics. The foregoing paragraphs 
of this survey afford numerous instances in which comparisons of 
the trade of different countries in rubber manufactures have been 
rendered either impossible or have been put forward with several 
qualifications owing to differences in the methods of collecting and 
arranging the statistics of different countries. Certain changes 
were made in 1927 in the trade returns of the United Kingdom 
which should be of great assistance to the industry but generally 
little progress has been made in establishing a common nomencla- 
ture and classification for rubber goods in the trade statistics of 
various countries. Greater uniformity and clarity would be of much 
assistance to the trade and would greatly facilitate the study of the 
developments of this expanding industry. We believe that this 
subject of greater uniformity in economic statistics ought to be 
dealt with internationally and we hope that it will be dealt with 
by the Committee on Customs Nomenclature now sitting under 
the auspices of the League of Nations; but whether international 
agreement can be arranged or not we are of opinion that greater 
aniformity in the statistics of Empire countries is a necessary prece-
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

A Survey of the Trade in Rubber Manufactured Goods. His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.