Völkerrecht und Landesrecht

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 189206295X

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-239471

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Triepel, Heinrich http://d-nb.info/gnd/117417920

Title:: Völkerrecht und Landesrecht

Place of publication:: Tübingen

Publisher:: Mohr Siebeck

Year of publication:: 1907

Scope:: XII, 452 S.

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Erstes Kapitel. Völkerrecht und Landesrecht als Gegensätze

Collection:: Economics Books

MAJORITY REPORT. I) ay or private income ; 3,900 on the ground of dependence on another person; 300 on account of dependence on another occupation ; 4,600 under the temporary provisions of the Act of 1919, and less than 100 on the score of intermittent employment. Tt will be seen, therefore, that the bulk of the cases are those in which the claim is made on the ground of pension or private income of £26 a year or more. 598. Where a certificate of exemption is granted, it in no way operates to relieve the employer of his liability to pay what would have been his appropriate share of the contribution had the employed person not received exemption. Contributions are thus paid in respect of exempt persons, but by the employer only. In respect of these contributions the exempt person becomes entitled to receive Medical Benefit, and we understand that the majority take advantage of this benefit. 529. Three points arise for consideration— (1) Whether the class should be abolished altogether, so that these persons would fall into the same category as ordinary insured persons. (2) Whether the requirement to pay the employer’s share of the contribution should be abolished, with the effect of placing exempt persons in the same position as those of the excepted classes. (3) Whether, continuing the present system, the arrange- ments under the 1911 Act, under which no benefit at all was given to these persons, should be reverted to, and the con- tributions collected in respect of them otherwise applied. 530. The Hearts of Oak Benefit Society suggest the retention of the class and the withdrawal of Medical Benefit, the contri- butions payable in respect of exempt persons being applied to- wards the cost of Medical Benefit for the dependants of insured persons (App. IV, 20-24; Q. 2571-2575). The Manchester Unity of Oddfellows suggest the amendment of Section 2 (1) (a) of the Act, which gives a title to exemption to persons in receipt of a Pension or private income of £26 or more, but express the opinion that if the class is retained there would be some justification for considering the withdrawal of the right to medical benefit. (App. VII, 73-74; Q. 5903-5905). « The National Association of Trade Union Approved Societies suggest the repeal of Section 2 (1) (a) of the Act (App. XCIIL, 75; Q. 21,857 and 21,914). The Scottish Board of Health think that there is no justification for this special class, that exempt per- sons have little claim for consideration, but that Medical Benefit 18 valued by them (Leishman, Q. 1554-1563). The view of the Ministry of Health is set out in the replies of Sir Walter Kinnear

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Völkerrecht und Landesrecht

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation