Proceedings of the South & East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1892063557

Document type:: Multivolume work

Author:: Lamprecht, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118569015

Title:: Deutsche Geschichte

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Gaertner

Year of publication:: 1891-

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 1892067714

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-237124

Document type:: Volume

Author:: Lamprecht, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118569015

Title:: Neuere Zeit

Volume count:: Abt. 2

Place of publication:: Freiburg im Breisgau

Publisher:: Heyfelder

Year of publication:: 1906

Scope:: XIV S., S. [399] - 873

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Viertes Kapitel. Erste Waffengänge Österreichs und Preußens; Preußen europäische Großmacht

Collection:: Economics Books

PART IV. particular case, had saved his crop and was, therefore, an economic: proposition. AMERICAN BOLL WORM. In reply to Mr. Ritchie, Mr. Parnell stated that he was rather sceptical as to the efficacy of maize as a trap crop for the American Cotton Boll worm. Mr. RITCHIE stated that, in Tanganyika no Chloridea was found on cotton bolls after June: there was only one generation on cotton bolls in the year. The place of Chloridea on maize was taken by a species of Diatraea. IMPORTATION OF SEED.* Mr. MILLIGAN said that the consensus of opinion was that it must be impressed on all countries how dangerous it was to admit seed on certificate only. Mr. PARNELL thought that there was no need to import cotton seed in bulk as small quantities, properly disinfected, were sufficient to produce, in a few years, the quantity necessary. Mr. KIRBY intimated that the present best method for Tanganyika was to import in bulk from countries from which there was little risk of the introduction of pests. The Tanganyika importa- tions were entirely from Uganda. Mr. HARDENBERG agreed with Mr. Kirby that bulk importation of seed must be allowed in certain cases in new countries, otherwise hardship might be caused to planters. Mr. WORTLEY thought that the risk involved in bulk importa- tions was far too great. CONTROL OF NATIVE COTTON INDUSTRY. The CHAIRMAN (Mr. Fuller) then read two paperst submitted by Mr. Sampson (T.C.(C)Cot.1 and T.C.(C)Cot.2). Mr. SIMPSON said that in the early days in Uganda seed cotton from Bukoba was allowed to be ginned at an isolated spot near Entebbe; also before ginneries were erected in Kenya, Kenya cotton had been ginned in Uganda. Nowadays, no seed cotton was coming in, only baled cotton from Kenya and the Congo passed through ‘‘ in transit ©’ on permit, if properly pressed and baled. He thought that if workers could not keep in touch by correspondence, visits should be paid to those territories where the desired information could be obtained. Mr. KIRBY supported the idea that it was the duty of officers to keep themselves informed as to what was happening in other places. CONTROL OF GINNERIES. The CHAIRMAN (Mr. Fuller) read Mr. Sampson's paper! (T.C.(C)Cot.7) on the control of ginneries, with special reference to the spread of disease. © See also page 177. For text of papers see Appendix. 183

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Proceedings of the South & East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926

Multivolume work

Volume

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation