MONEY AND INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY 229

ale
.es--
 of
ess
inac-



ce.
nd
do-»
 atthe

the
itis
but
WS
nal

er-118~


heen-




one
“ion
nto
:ar-/08~

the

subject and its objects were not viewed in contrast and opposition;
 and even when differentiation in consciousness
began, it was long before it resulted in actual independence.
Possession among primitive people was an immediate
activity of the individual; feudalism tied the individual to
the possession; hereditary professions and caste and guild
systems signify an intimate connection between the possession
 or the economic function and the whole of the personality.
 With the advance in civilization there begins a
differentiation which results in the growth of self-sufficient
 economic processes, in the development of an impersonal
 technique on the one hand and a growth in individual
independence on the other hand.
In this process of differentiation, money exercises the
function of enlarging the distance between the possessor
and his possessions. The shareholder of an industrial concern
 and the landholder who leases his farm leave the running
 of their property to a purely technical administration.
They merely enjoy the fruits without participating in the
actual production. This is possible only in a money economy.
 Money allows the possessor and the possession to
exist each according to its own laws, and drives them completely
 apart.
This completion of the process of differentiation
through the introduction of money is manifest, not only in
the receiver of rent or interest, but also in the producer
of goods or of services. It means in all cases a differentiation
 between the personality and the object or the service,
and the entrance of one of these into the economic system.
The money economy allows the substitution for personal
services of an objectively defined function, either in terms
of objects for a market instead of for a client, or in terms
of a definite amount of labor power. In this case only the
function enters into the economic system and finds its