fullscreen : Cost of living in German towns

BERLIN.

21

Various  forms  and  combinations  of  the  back  house  have  in  course  of  time  been
evolved.  The  simplest  and  the  original  form  is  an  extension  of  the  front  building
on  both  sides  to  the  rear  by  wings  which  are  connected  by  a  “cross”  (quer)
building  running  parallel  with  the  street,  so  that  a  rectangular  space  is  enclosed
forming  the  courtyard  or  Hof.  The  building  regulations,  however,  do  not  stipulate
how  architects  shall  dispose  of  the  space  behind  the  front  house,  and  the
latitude  thus  allowed  to  them  has  led  to  a  diversity  of  practice.  Sometimes
a  middle  wing  projects  behind  the  front  house,  with  open  space  on  both
sides,  this  wing  leading  to  a  cross-building  (  Quergebäude  )  extending  the  entire
width  of  the  plot.  The  back  house  may  also  take  the  form  of  an  isolated
lateral  block  surrounded  on  three  sides  by  the  courtyard,  or  instead  of
this  “side  building,”  as  it  is  called,  there  may  be  a  “middle  building”
standing  back  on  the  boundary  line  with  open  space  on  either  side.  or  in
front.  The  semi-detached  back  house,  whether  a  wing  or  a  cross-building,
is  invariably  entered  from  the  courtyard  by  a  separate  door.
The  most  notorious  “  barrack  ”  house  of  Berlin,  and  the  classic  example  ot
a  congested  building  site,  is  situated  in  the  northern  part  of  the  city  and  bears
the  name  Meyershof.  It  is  a  property  consisting  of  a  front  house  and  five
parallel  buildings  behind,  divided  by  courtyards  some  24  yards  wide  by  12
yards  deep.  Each  of  the  back  buildings  is  entered  by  two  doors  from  its  own
court,  and  the  uniform  height  is  five  stories  with  basements.  The  basements
are  still  used  as  dwellings  in  some  cases,  but  the  great  majority  have
gradually  been  diverted  to  business  purposes.  The  entire  property  contains
250  dwellings,  and  in  these  dwellings  are  housed  some  800  persons.  The  usual
accommodation  comprises  either  a  large  living  and  bedroom  and  a  large  kitchen,
or  a  living  and  bedroom,  an  anteroom,  and  a  small  kitchen.  Each  tenant  has
also  the  right  to  a  corner  of  the  large  attic.  The  dwellings  are  approached
from  corridors  entered  from  small  landings,  and  as  a  rule  there  are  three
dwellings  to  each  corridor.  The  closets  were  formerly  in  the  courtyards  ;  now
a  room  on  each  corridor  has  been  set  apart  for  the  purpose,  and  it  serves  for
three  households.  There  is  little  difference  in  the  cubical  capacity  of  the
dwellings,  whether  consisting  of  one  or  two  rooms  and  a  kitchen,  for  the
second  living  room  has,  as  a  rule,  been  formed  by  converting  the  large
kitchen  into  two  apartments.  The  usual  dimensions  are  as  follows  :—Living
and  bedroom,  17  feet  by  15  feet  by  9  feet  3  inches  high  ;  ante-room  (often
used  as  a  second  bedroom,  though  it  is  not  heatable  and  has  no  arrangements
for  ventilation),  12  feet  by  4  feet  6  inches  by  9  feet  3  inches  high  ;  kitchen,
12  feet  by  6  feet  by  9  feet  3  inches  high.  The  rooms  are  papered,  and
if  better  lighted  would  wear  a  friendly  aspect.  The  courtyards,  on  the
other  hand,  are  dismal  in  the  extreme.  No  sun  enters  them,  and  as
half  the  area  is  taken  up  with  carts,  coals,  wood,  and  odd  lumber,  but  a
small  space  remains  as  a  playground  for  the  children.  Meyershof  is  the
largest  individual  property  occupied  entirely  by  working-class  households,  but
houses  consisting  of  four  parallel  blocks,  with  three  intervening  courtyards,
each  smaller,  darker  and  duller  than  the  other,  are  common.  The  rents  in
Meyershof  range  from  £10  10s.  to  £12  per  annum  (equal  to  from  4s.  to
4s.  Id.  per  week,  without  rates),  according  to  story,  for  a  large  room  and  a
kitchen.
Little  can  be  said  in  favour  of  the  courtyard  system  of  building,  much  in
disfavour,  and  that  from  various  standpoints.  It  is  merely  a  builder’s  device
for  exploiting  costly  sites  to  the  best  monetary  advantage,  and  it  cannot  be
pretended  that  it  ranks  in  the  evolution  of  domestic  architecture  as  an  improved
type.  Nothing  could  be  more  depressing  than  the  sight  of  the  huge  structures
which  surround  many  of  the  courtyards  in  working-class  districts  of  Berlin.
The  street  outside  may  be  monotonous  in  the  uniformity  of  its  long  rows  of
high  buildings,  each  like  the  other  in  every  detail  of  structure  and  external
finish,  yet  it  is  wide  and  spacious,  and  the  colouring  of  the  inevitable  stucco
brightens  the  scene.  Entering  a  typical  courtyard,  however,  one  finds  oneself
standing  upon  an  arid  piece  of  plaster,  as  a  rule  quite  deserted.  Looking
around  and  above,  the  eye  rests  upon  large  expanses  of  wall  and  window  rising
to  a  height  of  five  or  six  stories.  There  is  no  noise  in  the  courtyard,  for  the
convenience  of  20  or  30  families  requires  absolute  quiet,  and  the  house  regulations ­
  are  stringent  upon  the  point  :  in  most  houses  even  the  playing  of  children
in  the  courtyard  is  expressly  forbidden.
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.