THE SCOPE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS I93
an actual trial. The psychologist who presumes to apply
tests to kinds of work which he understands only superficially
to groups of men whose work is alike only in
superficial details, and in cases where the reliability of the
results rests not upon an impersonal record of actual work
but upon a concoction of personal opinions, is indeed
taking a very grave risk of bringing his medium into disrepute
among those whose business it is to be familiar
■with the complexities and intricacies of employment work.
No doubt all of these faults have occurred in the experiments
described here; but they are recognized as weaknesses
and the results discounted accordingly.
The virtue of the psychological method consists in
a pplying to the abilities of people certain scientifically
accurate tests, tests whose value has first been determined
by means of experiments which meet the conditions
described. The superiority of such measures over the
ordinary haphazard measures of common sense is obvious.
However, this very virtue is also the weakness of
the psychological method or, in fact, of any scientific
method. Tests and measures are only significant when
applied to cases which conform to standard conditions.
The diagnostic tests applied by the physician, for instance,
e nable him to determine the nature of an illness like
measles which, because of its invariable symptoms, we
may call standard. However, as soon as an extraordinary
dlness occurs, his tests become useless. They do not
enable him to diagnose the nature of the disease, and it
becomes necessary to call in specialists who, in many cases,
are also unable to determine the exact nature of the
trouble. The more complicated and exceptional the disease,
the less applicable are the ordinary laws and measures
°f the physician. Exactly the same condition prevails in