THE MEASURE OF COMPARATIVE PRODUCTIVENESS 3II
money because money is the universal language into
which all production is translated. The total piece-work
or bonus earnings (column 3) divided by the number of
hours worked (column 4) gives the average earnings per
hour (column 5). Since these earnings stand for a certain
amount of good work done, this hourly average is the
index to the worker’s productiveness. However, in order
to compare his productiveness with that of others, it is
necessary to obtain the hourly average or rate of production
for the entire group. This is done by adding the
hourly average of all individuals engaged in the same
kind of work (see column 1, kind of work), and dividing
it by the number of individuals at work. The group
average (column 6) therefore represents the standard by
which the comparative productiveness of individuals may
be judged. When the hourly average of an individual is
higher than the group average for a given week or series
of weeks, it is obvious that the productiveness of that
individual is high in comparison with that of the majority
of the group.
This method of computing the group average and using
it as a standard for comparison has certain very desirable
features. In the first place, it is based upon the actual
production of the workers engaged. Instead of bringing
in a fixed and more or less theoretical standard of what
all workers ought to do, it compares the individuals of a
group with each other on the basis of what they are doing.
Thus, it is just as effective in separating the sheep from
the goats as the most rigid method imaginable, without
having even a semblance of unfairness or pressure. Secondly,
such a standard varies with the varying conditions
of production. Every manager knows that production
is not a smooth and orderly process at all times. There