Full text: The agrarian system of Moslem India

150 THE AGRARIAN SYSTEM OF MOSLEM INDIA 
Jandholders, which was to be recognised by British law as 
homogeneous; the earlier stages in these developments 
form the subject of the next section 
5. INTERMEDIARIES UNDER AURANGZEB AND 
HIS SUCCESSORS 
We have seen in a previous section that, in the middle 
of the seventeenth century, the great bulk of the revenue 
was assigned, as much as 19 krors out of the total of 22; 
and consequently the assignees were at that period much 
the most important class of Intermediaries between the 
Emperor and the peasants. During the next half century, 
a gradual change occurred, and shortly after the end of 
Aurangzeb’s reign, Assignments, taken as a whole, had 
become unremunerative, and were naturally unpopular; 
they continued to be made, but energetic men preferred 
a title resting on force to one which was based on paper, and 
in the course of the eighteenth century the Taluq, or 
“Dependency,” came to take the place of the Assignment 
as the most prominent agrarian institution. 
The unpopularity of Assignments is a familiar. topic in 
the chronicle written by Khwafi Khan shortly after Aurang- 
zeb’s death. The most noteworthy passage is a digression! 
where, after describing the liberality of Shahjahan in 
equipping his officers for active service, the chronicler 
proceeds to stress the contrast between past and: present. 
Nowadays, he says in effect, perhaps one or two in a hundred 
of the wretched assignees may get a morsel of bread from 
their Assignments, but the rest are starving mendicants; 
while those who are nominally on the cash-roll may possibly 
receive their pay for a year or two at most. The passage 
is rhetorical, and the writer was obviously a pessimist, 
so that his language must be somewhat heavily discounted; 
but there is no reason to suppose that it does not represent 
in substance the opinion current in the first quarter of the 
eighteenth century. Perhaps its most significant feature 
1 Khwafi, i. 622. The approximate date of this chronicle is fixed by 
such passages as ii. 378. where the vear of writing is given as 1135 H, or 
1722-13.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.