Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

cHAP. 1] POWERS OF DOMINION PARLIAMENTS 361 
clearly that it was not a sound argument that, because 
a change might be deliberately made by Parliament in a 
constitution, therefore any ordinary Act whatever might be 
passed, though in contravention of constitutional provisions 
as they stood. 
On the other hand, there may be cases in which the Parlia- 
ment has really delegative powers, as under the Coinage 
(Colonial) Offences Act, 1858, the Extradition Act, 1870, the 
Mail Ships Act, 1891, the Army Act, 1881, ss. 156 (8) 
and 169, in which cases the usual rules as to delegated power 
would apply.! 
8 2. THE LIMITATION OF THE POWERS OF THE 
PARLIAMENTS 
Although within their own sphere plenary, there are im- 
posed on the legislative powers of Dominion Parliaments 
certain restrictions which may be classed under four heads : 
(1) those arising from the essential character of a Parliament 
of a dependency as not sovereign in the full sense; (2) the 
territorial limits of their authority ; (3) the rule of non- 
repugnancy to Imperial law, and (4) the limitations as to 
ronstitutional change. 
From time to time, and in various forms, there has 
appeared the doctrine that there are certain subjects which 
are of so Imperial a character that they cannot be regarded 
as falling within the purview of any Colonial Legislature 
whatever, however august. Thus Robinson C.J. held in 
the case of Tully v. The Principal Officers of Her Majesty's 
Ordnance? that it was simply impossible for the Colonial 
Legislature to affect a right of the Ordnance, a department 
not in the country at all, though officers of it might be. The 
same point of view is represented by certain passages in the 
U Harrison Moore, Commonwealth of Australia,® pp. 271, 272. 
* (1847) 5 U. C. Q. B. 6; Lefroy, Legislative Power in Canada, pp. 333, 
758 ; 308. C. R., at pp. 47, 48. In this particular case the doctrine can 
be defended on the ground that the consent of the Imperial Government 
is necessary for proceedings against the Crown in its Imperial capacity ; 
of. pp. 144, 145, and Cape Town Council v. Hoskyn and others, 14 C. T. R. 
386 : Palmer v. Hutchinson. 6 App. Cas. 619, Fraser v. Sivewright. 3 S. C. 55.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.