Full text : Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); together with the proceedings of the Committee, minutes of evidence, appendix and index

64

MINUTES  OF  EVIDENCE  TAKEN  BEFORE  SELECT  COMMITTEE

Sir
ly,  Coghlan.
<24  July
1871.

894.  Supposing  its  reconsideration  came  before
the  Imperial  or  the  Indian  Government,  do  you
think  it  should  be  decided  on  its  own  merits  or
mixed  up  with  the  slave  question?—On  its  own
merits,  I  think  ;  though  I  was  reporting  on  the
slave  traffic,  my  principal  business  was  the  adjustment ­
  of  affairs  between  the  two  Sultans.  The
slave  traffic  was  merely  a  matter  thrown  .in.
895.  Mr.  Kinnaird!\  It  was  not  for  want  of
representation,  I  think,  from  the  Indian  Government ­
  that  that  opportunity  was  missed  ;  it  was
the  Home  Government  who  neglected  the  opportunity ­
  ?—I  understand  (in  fact,  some  papers  were
sent  to  me  on  the  subject)  that  the  Governor
General  decided  that  it  must  be  paid.
896.  His  view  being  that  it  was  a  dynastic
arrangement  ?—Yes.
897.  When  you  returned  to  Aden,  in  1863,
three  years  subsequent  to  your  report,  did  any
additional  evidence  come  before  you  at  all  to
alter  your  report?—Nothing  at  all:  in  fact,  the
only  way  in  which  the  question  of  the  slave  trade
was  mentioned  to  me  on  that  occasion  was  by  a
complaint  from  some  of  the  native  merchants,
who  said  that  their  traffic  was  interfered  with  by
the  cruisers  ;  they  did  not  complain  of  the  operation ­
  of  the  law  ;  they  did  not  complain  of  vessels
being  interfered  with  which  really  carried  slaves;
but  they  said,  in  some  cases,  vessels  which  carried ­
  no  slaves  were  condemned,  and  with  them
all  evidence  of  their  character  ;  therefore,  they
said  we  are  afraid  to  send  our  ships  to  sea.
898.  Do  you  believe,  from  your  residence  in
the  East,  that  a  very  large  legitimate  trade  would
grow  up,  if  the  slave  trade  was  put  down?—I
have  no  doubt  that  there  would  be  a  large  development ­
  of  trade  on  that  coast.
899.  Have  you  any  suggestions  apart  from
your  report  to  make,  as  to  the  best  mode  of  suppressing ­
  the  slave  trade  ?—Obviously  the  first
would  be  to  get  the  Sultan  of  Zanzibar  to  cancel
the  treaty  by  which  he  is  allowed  to  carry  slaves
within  his  own  dominions.
900.  If  he  agreed  only  to  have  one  port  of  export,
which  could  be  watched,  would  not  that  greatly
facilitate  the  suppression  of  the  trade  ?—It  would
be  still  better  to  have  none  ;  Sultan  Majid,  the
one  who  died  a  few  months  ago,  agreed  with  me
that  it  should  be  so;  he  said,  I  will  do  anything
you  please,  only  I  request  you  to  remember  that
this  forms  a  sixth  part  of  my  revenue.
901.  If  our  Government  undertook  to  free  him
from  that  liability  to  pay  8,000  Z.  a  year,  would
he  agree  to  the  treaty  being  altered,  and  abolish
the  slave  trade?—I  should,  think  he  would  for
less  than  that  ;  he  said  to  me  that  this  formed
one-sixth  part  of  his  revenue;  say  that  19,000
slaves  were  imported  into  Zanzibar  ;  upon  that
19,000  he  got  two  dollars  a  head,  that  is  38,000
dollars,  that  would  be  7,000  Z.  or  8,000  Z.
902.  Would  that,  in  your  opinion,  be  a  very
good  mode  of  stopping  the  slave  trade  ?—I  think
so  ;  General  Eigby  is  a  better  authority  upon
that  subject  than  I  am.
903.  Would  not  the  relieving  him  from  the
payment  of  the  amount  of  the  subsidy  be  much
cheaper  than  keejiing  a  large  squadron  on  the
coast  ?—Yes.
904.  Mr.  ./.  Talhot.~\  Would  it  prevent  the
necessity  of  keeping  a  squadron  on  the  coast?—
Perhaps  not  altogether,  because  people  would  be
found  to  break  the  law  ;  in  fact,  Europeans

would  do  it.  One  of  the  greatest  slave  trafficker^
of  my  day  was  a  Spaniard  ;  I  saw  his  vessel  cap'
tured  with^860  slaves  on  board.
905.  Mr.  Crum-Ewing.~\  Where  was  he  taking
them  to  ?—I  saw  the  vessel  just  after  she  wacaptured
  at  the  Mauritius.
906.  Were  they  taking  them  to  Cuba?—Yes.
907.  Mr.  Kitinaird.l  What  date  was  that?—
About  August  or  September  I860;  she  was  ^
large  ship,  captured  by  the  Brisk.”
908.  Have  you  any  reason  to  believe  that  ther®
is  even  now  a  trade  in  slaves  from  the  East  Coasl
of  Africa  to  Cuba  ?—I  have  no  means  of  forming
an  opinion  upon  that.
909.  Sir  J.  Hay.~\  Is  not  the  great  difficult)
in  stopping  the  slave  trade  there  more  than
any  other  place  ;  the  difficulty  in  distinguishing
between  domestic  slaves  and  slaves  intended  fot
sale  in  foreign  ports  ?—That  would  be  a  difficult)'
to  naval  officers,  but  during  the  time  that  I  w»’
at  Aden  there  was  no  difficulty  of  that  sort!
almost  all  the  country  craft  that  came  into  tb^
harbour  were  navigated  by  slaves  ;  we  nevot
thought  of  interfering  with  them  ;  but  if  a  vessel
had  come  in  with  slaves  for  sale,  we  should  nt
once  have  seized  her,
910.  Mr.  Crum~EwÙ7g.'\  You  are  of  opinio^
that  we  cannot  terminate  the  subsidy  now  paid  to
the  Imaum  of  Muscat  ?—I  think  not
911.  Is  there  no  termination  to  it  at  all?-"
When  I  made  the  award,  I  looked  to  a  perio«^
when  the  two  Governments  would  fall  into  onO
hand  as  before,  under  the  father;  that  was  alwa)'^
looked  to  as  a  possible  contingency.  That,  oí
course,  would  have  smoothed  the  difficulty  oí
once.

912.  Mr.  jP.  TVynd]iam.~\  Do  you  think  thoi
the  Sultan  of  Zanzibar  is  likely  now  to  be  satis'
tied  with  the  same  sum  that  you  think  wouD
have  satisfied  him  previously  as  a  compensatio^
for  giving  up  the  slave  trade  ?—I  think  so.  ^
found  him  tractable.
913.  You  have  no  reason  to  believe  that  tb^
trade  is  more  valuable  to  him  now  ?—No.
914.  Mr.  Crum-Eicirg.~\  The  Imaum  of  MuS'
cat  would  look  to  the  Sultan  of  Zanzibar  in  tb^
first  instance  for  the  payment  of  his  subsidy?-^
Yes;  there  is  no  longer  an  Imaum  of  Muscat!
he  is  the  Sultan  of  Muscat  ;  of  course  he  wouD
look  to  his  brother,  but  it  is  morally  guarantee*^  j
by  the  British  Government.
915.  Mr.  Kennaway.']  Did  the  Sultan  of  ZaH'
zibar,  in  any  conversation  he  had  with  you  with
reference  to  the  slave  trade,  contemplate  the  po5'  '
sibility  of  its  being  put  down  ?—Yes,  I  put  tb^  :
question  to  him,  and  you  will  find  a  reference
it  in  my  report.
916.  Did  he  see  any  difficulty  in  its  being  pn^
down  ?—No  ;  he  said  I  will  do  whatever  yo^l
please,  only  give  me  your  support,  by  which  0*
course  I  understood  he  meant  money.
917.  Chairman.']  Not  merely  moral  support-  '
—No  ;  I  quite  understood  he  meant  by  that,  that  '
he  wanted  to  be  indemnified.
918.  Mr.  Kennaioay.]  Would  he  have  be^^
satisfied  with  a  few  old  arms  ?—No,  he  had  pleut)
of  them.
919.  Chairman.]  Ig  there  anything  you  w'isb
to  add  to  the  evidence  you  have  given  ?—I  lua/
mention  that,  so  far  as  the  native  chiefs  withi*^  t
the  Gulf  of  Aden  are  concerned,  I  made  a  treat/
with,  I  think,  every  one  of  them  ;  I  visited  evef)
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.