214
MAJORITY REPORT.
As to (1) the Committee thought that there was no serious
risk of a Society having excessive claims for several years in
succession ; and as to (2), the problem did not appear to them,
after examination of the statistical data, to be of such magnitude
as to call for special treatment.
508. In accordance, however, with their instructions they
prepared a scheme for re-insurance. This scheme brought out
the complications inherent in the proposition and demonstrated
the heavy labour which would be involved in applying any sound
arrangement of the kind.
509. On the first (1918) valuation the Government Actuary
reported a saving in maternity benefit payments on men’s
insurance of 20 per cent. of the expected payments, and on
women’s insurance of 36 per cent. One factor was the reduced
birth rate during the war; but an examination of the experience
since 1918 suggests that the maternity payments will, in general,
continue to be within the financial provision for the benefit, and
that any excess in particular Societies is not of sufficient im-
portance to justify the introduction of a complicated system of
re-insurance.
510. We are of the opinion that reinsurance in the strict
sense, i.e., by distributing the charge with reference to the
actuarial value of the risk undertaken by each individual Society
in respect of the benefit is not practicable. We are advised,
moreover, that in the calculation of the contribution and reserve
values as well as in the valuations, account is taken of the varied
incidence of the cost of maternity benefit with regard to age,
sex, and in the case of women, marital condition, and that a
mere pooling of the cost at a uniform rate per head of the
membership would be inconsistent with these conditions. while
it would certainly be inequitable.
511. We, therefore, recommend that no steps should be taken
to put into operation the provisions of Section 25 of the Act, and
that the section should be repealed.
SECTION D.—SPECIAL CLASSES OF INSURED
PERSONS.
MARRIED WOMEN.
512. The question of the provision to be made with regard to
the insurance of women who give up insurable employment at or
about the time of their marriage has from the first been a matter
of great difficulty. Under Section 44 of the Act of 1911 insured
women who married had, in the first place, to satisfy their
Approved Societies as to whether they had definitely given up
employment or not. No precise test of cessation of employment
was laid down in the Act and in practice it followed that Societies
were to a larce extent compelled to depend upon the woman's