TABLE OF CASES CITED xix 
Attorney-General for Canada v. Attor- 
ney-General of Ontario (The Pardon- 
ing or Executive Power case), 23 
S.C.R. 458, 5 Cart. 517: 105 n.1, 
364 n. 1, 663, 664 n.1, 666 n., 667n., 
680 n. 5, 686, 1386 n. 1. 
Attorney-General for the Dominion 
of Canada v. Attorney-General for On. 
tario, [1897] A.C. 199: 6841.2, 688. 
ltéorney- General for the Dominion of 
Canada v. Attorney-General for the 
Province of Ontario, [1898] A.C. 247; 
681 n.1, 1299 n, 2. 
Attorney-General for the Dominion of 
Canada v. Attorneys-General for the 
Provinces of Ontario, dec., [1898] 
A.C. 700: 679 n.1, 682 n. 2, 1385. 
Attorney-General for the Cape of Good 
Hope v. van Reenen, [19041 A.C. 114: 
272, 279. 
dltorney-General for the Common- 
wealth v. Ah Sheung, 4 C.L.R. 949 : 
820 n.3, 1083 n. 5, 1454 n. 1. 
Attorney-General for Manitoba v. 
ditorney-Qeneral for Canada, [1904] 
A.C. 799: 1051 n. 1. 
1ttorney-General for Manitoba  v. 
Manitoba Licence Holders Associa- 
tion, [1902] A.C. 73: 677. 
1ttorney-General for New South Wales 
Vv. Brewery Employés’ Union of New 
South Wales, 6 C.L.R. 469 : 840-3. 
Ltorney-General of New South Wales 
v. Collector of Customs, 5C.L.R. 818: 
793, 794, 836, 837, 906 n. 2. 
litorney-General of New South Wales 
v. Collector of Customs, [1909] A.C. 
345: 1372 n. 2. 
Lttorney-General of New South Wales 
v. Curator of Intestate Estates, [1907] 
A.C. 519: 145 n.4, 363 n. 2. : 
Attorney-General for New South Wales 
V. Love, [18987 A.C. 679: 411 n. 1. 
ditorney-General of New South Wales 
v. Rennie, 16 N.SW.L.R. 11l, 
[1896] A.C. 376: 503 n.4. 
Attorney-General of Newfoundland v. 
Commercial Cable Co., Royal Gazette, 
October 17, 1911 : 1615. 
1ttorney-General of Ontario v. Atiorney- 
General for the Dominion of Canada, 
[1894] ‘A.C. 189: 714, 722 n.1. 
724 n. 4. 
Attorney-General for Ontario v. Attor- 
ney-General for the Dominion and 
Brewers’ Association of Ontario, 
[1896] A.C. 348 : 676 n. 2,677n.1, 
704, 719 nn. 1, 2, 720 n. 3, 721 n.1, 
723 1.3, 724 n. 2,725 n.4, 1385 n. 2. 
Attorney-General for Ontario v. Attor- 
h 
ney-General for Quebec, [1903] A.C. 
39: 760n. 1. 
ttorney-Qeneral for Ontario v. Hamil: 
ton Street Railway, [1903] A.C. 524 : 
699, 754 n. 1. 
{ttorney-General of Ontario v. Mercer, 
8 App.Cas. 767 : 146 n. 3, 657, 680. 
{ttorney-General for Prince Bdward 
Island v. Attorney-General for Do- 
manion of Canada, [1905] A.C. 37 : 
513, 653 n. 1, 754 n. 5, 772 n. 2, 792. 
Vttorney-General of Quebec v. Attorney- 
General of Canada, 1 Q.L.R. 197 : 
680 n. 1. 
Lttorney-General of Quebec v. Queen 
Insurance Co., 3 App.Cas. 1090: 
704 n. 1, 843, 
1ttorney-General of Quebec v. Reed, 
10 App.Cas. 141: 704 n, 2. 
Attorney-General of Queensland +. 
Gibbon, 12 App.Cas. 442 : 525, 1385 
nl 
Auld v. Murray : 408. 
in re Australasian Automatic Weighing 
Machine, 1 Tas.L.R. 113: 895 n. 1. 
dustralian Boot Trade Employés 
Federation v. Whybrow & Company, 
10 C.L.R. 266 : 848-57. 
Australian Boot Trade Employés' 
Federation v. Whybrow & Company, 
11 C.L.R. 311 : 863 n.2. 
n re Award of Wellington Cooks’ and 
Stewards’ Union, 26 N.Z.1.R. 394 : 
396-9, 1200-2, 1320, 1454 n. 5. 
in re Bahama Islands, [1893] A.C. 138: 
1421 n. 3. 
Baird v. Walker (cf, Peters v. Olsen, 
4 Adam, 608; Mortensen v. Pelers, 
5 Adam, 121), 1897 Newfoundland 
Decisions, 490 : 1103, 1104. 
Baldick and Others v. Jackson, 30 
N.Z.L.R. 343 : 146 n. 3. 
Bank of Australasia v. Nias, 16 Q.B. 
717: 402. 
Bank of Toronto v. Lambe, 12 App.Cas. 
575: 672 n.2, 673, 704 n.4, 718, 
722 n.2, 725 n. 5. 
re Robert Barbour, 12 N.S W.L.R., 90 : 
1365 n. 2, 
Barton v. The Queen, 2 Moo.P.C. 19: 
1348 n. 2. 
Barton v. Taylor, 11 App.Cas. 197: 447. 
n_re Bateman’s Trust, 15 Eq. 355: 
145 n. 3, 658 n. 1, 1457 n. 
Baume v. The Commonwealth, 4 C.L.R. 
97: 879 n.3. 
Baxter v.AhWay,8C.L.R. 626: 359,360. 
Baxter v. Commissioners of Taxation, 
New South Wales, 4 C.L.R. 1087 :