Object: Banking standards under the federal reserve system

32 
BANKING STANDARDS 
total expense to earning assets is 4.59. This figure is derived by 
dividing the total expense during these years and for these dis- 
tricts by the total earning assets and multiplying by roo. The 
yearly figures for the combined districts and the seven-year av- 
erage amount for each district are obtained in a similar manner. 
The ratios for the twelve districts and for the years in question, 
as thus derived, are given in Table 56. An inspection of this 
TABLE 56 
Ratios oF ToTAL EXPENSE TO EARNING ASSETS IN Ari MEMBER 
Banks, FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, BY YEARS AND 
BY FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS 
FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS 
——————————« 
Boston. ..... 
New York..... 
Philadelphia. . .* 
Cleveland. .. 
Richmond... 
Atlanta. ..... 
Chicago. ..... 
5t. Louis...... 
Minneapolis. . . 
Kansas City.. 
Pallas. ....... 
San Francisco. .. 
Average 
(All Districts) 
Averag: 
(1919- 
1925) 
A.50 
RaTine OF ToTAL EXPENSE TO ™ARNING ASSETS 
1024 | 1025 
1019 | 1920 | 1921 1022 | 
4.08 
4.33 i 5.08 
4.54 ) 
4.68 | 4.56 
——————— 
4.82 
aD. 
- 
4.17 
4.04 
“a 
Jo 
Ar. 
4.29 
4.23 
4.04 
PARR. 
4.30 
3.99 
4.c5 
4.85 
4.69 
5.08 
4.65 
4.77 
r.26 
r.74 
'.387 
5,AT 
table shows that the ratios differ from year to year for the com- 
bined districts and from district to district for the individual and 
for the combined years. Accordingly, they may be analyzed with 
these and other characteristics in mind. If they are grouped in 
frequency form, no account being taken of the separate years and 
districts, the distribution shown in Chart 17 is obtained. 
The chart shows that the ratios cluster at the group 4.25-4.75, 
the distribution around this modal or typical group approaching 
the normal or bell-shaped type. They range from 3.49, for Phila- 
delphia in 19109, to 6.46 for Dallas in 1921. There are, however, 
comparatively few amounts at the extremes, 68% of the instances 
falling between the limits 3.75 and 5.25. This chart, while it 
takes no account of district or yearly differences, has the merit of 
showing in simple form the typical or modal ratios, the range over 
which the ratios extend, and the manner in which they cluster
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.