Object: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

CHAP. viii] RELATIONS OF THE HOUSES 573 
been made by Sir James Martin’s Ministry, namely fifteen 
out of thirty-one, had had the result that the Council had 
defeated the Bill by nine against it to eight in favour of it. 
This result showed that the Government could not rely on 
passing useful measures. They were unwilling to take steps 
to swamp the Upper Chamber, but they could not accept 
the existing position, and they proposed to introduce a Bill 
to reconstruct the Council on an elective basis. They could 
not expect to carry their Bill if the Council were determined 
to oppose it, and therefore so long as the nominee principle 
existed they were determined to maintain the principle laid 
down by Mr. Wentworth. The minute ended by saying that 
‘While dutifully expressing their loyal attachment to the 
Throne and institutions of the Empire, your Excellency’s 
advisers cannot, even by implication, consent to relinquish 
the smallest vestige of the liberties of this Colony, or concur 
in any rule or instruction at variance with the absolute right 
of its people to govern themselves in all matters within their 
own shores, as secured to them by the Constitution’, In 
a subsequent dispatch of August 27, 18721 the Governor 
expressed his personal view on the situation. He considered 
that if further additions were made to the House—e. g. if it 
were increased to thirty-six in number, being one-half the 
number of the Assembly, it would furnish a precedent for 
future additions which it would be difficult to resist. He 
therefore considered that the principle of maintaining the 
House should not be altered. 
The Secretary of State for the Colonies in his dispatch of 
November 29, 18722 maintained the principle that the 
Numbers ought really to be limited. He pointed out that 
it was doubtful whether a Legislative Council on an elective 
basis would not be more liable to come into collision with the 
fepresentatives of the Assembly. He added that the main- 
tenance of the rule to limit the numbers had been agreed 
Pon to begin with in the Colony, and was in itself reasonable, 
and was not really being forced on the Colony by the Secretary 
of State. He trusted, therefore, that the Government would 
* Parl. Pap., H. C. 198, 1893-4, p. 94. 2 Thid., p. 98.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.