Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

CHAP. viii] RELATIONS OF THE HOUSES 571 
1864, and though they had received a dissolution the result 
had not encouraged them. Moreover, the moment the new 
Parliament was opened a vote of want of confidence was 
carried by a majority of forty-two to fourteen. But he laid 
stress upon the argument that it was essential to maintain 
the strength of the Council, which otherwise would cease to 
have any independent position. A Governor should have 
a recognized independent discretion ; the nominations to the 
Upper House ought not to be viewed as mere appointments, 
the refusal to sanction which might justly be considered an 
interference with proper ministerial action and responsibility. 
Her Majesty’s Government and the people of the Colony 
were entitled to hold the Governor responsible for securing 
the preservation of the Legislative Council as an efficient 
branch of the Legislature. The number had been fixed in 
1861 at twenty-seven, not as absolutely rigid but as meeting 
the deliberate opinion of ‘all parties then, and implying 
a sound principle. The Secretary of State in a dispatch of 
May 6, 1865, approved entirely the action of the Governor. 
On September 29, 1868,! the Governor, Lord Belmore, re- 
ported that he had added three members to the Council owing 
to the difficulty of making up a quorum. In acknowledging 
the receipt of this dispatch on December 18, 1868, Lord 
Granville approved his action, but said that any increase of 
the number of the Council was likely to be used as a prece- 
dent for further additions, and was therefore to be regretted, 
and that he should have been glad to be assured that the 
addition was not in fact politically material as altering the 
balance in any important degree in favour of the Ministry 
by which it was suggested. Lord Belmore submitted this 
dispatch to his Prime Minister, who drew up a memorandum 2 
on the question, in which he laid down that the dispatch was 
based on a misapprehension, and that the Government could 
not admit that the responsible ministers of the Governor 
might not advise an increase in the numbers. In law the 
Number was unlimited, and the Secretary of State must have 
overlooked that fact, or he would not have questioned any 
* Parl. Pap., H. C. 198, 1893-4, p. 71. ? Ibid., p. 79. 
I)
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.