THE SOCIALISM OF TO-DAY.
56
wages, will be determined by the minimum which it costs to
maintain the labourer, a minimum which, in this case, answers
to the least cost of production of this particular merchandise,
the productive force of the labourer.
If such, concludes Lassalle, be the general law, those
institutions extolled by Herr Schulze-Delitzsch can succeed no
better than the old methods of Charity and Patronage, in per
manently ameliorating the condition of the labouring classes.
The reason is this : so long as it is merely a question of a
limited number of working men, these will clearly derive an
advantage by obtaining the commodities they require, at a
cheaper rate and of a better quality, from a co-operative society ;
but if the majority of working men profited by these institu
tions, the consequence would be that they would live in the
same way as they now do, only with less expense ; the minimum
cost of living, that is, the minimum cost of production of
labour, would be lowered ; and since this minimum is the level
towards which competition tends to reduce all wages, it follows
that wages would be lowered in proportion as the cost of
maintaining the labourer became less. It is thus that Lassalle
endeavours to show the futility of the efforts of Herr Schulze-
Delitzsch and other bourgeois philanthropists, who hope to
better the condition of the labouring classes, without altering
the actual organization of society. All those attempts, inspired
by the goodness of their hearts, come to grief against the
“ iron law.”
This reasoning, based upon the generally accepted prin
ciples of orthodox Political Economy, brought upon Lassalle
the most virulent attacks from the national Liberal papers. He
replied to them no less violently.* He had no difficulty in
proving that the theory of wages described by him, however
disheartening it might seem, was merely that of the masters
of Political Economy, of Adam Smith, J. B. Say, Ricardo,
J. S. Mill, Rau, Roscher, Zachariae, and of all their disciples.
Even before them, Turgot had formulated the same idea in
that wonderful language, clear as a crystal, of the eighteenth
* Zur Arbeiterfrage, Rede zu Leipzig, am 16 April, 1863. Rede zu
Frankfurt, am 17 und 19 Mai, 1863.