38
A Study of Student Loans and
TABLE 5
AVERAGE FIXED CHARGES IN PRIVATELY ENDOWED
INSTITUTIONS, UNITED STATES 1900-25 1
Charges Per Student for an Academic Year Increase
Department 1900-01 1905-06 1911-12 1915-16 1920-21 1921-22 1924-25 (1900-25)
Average $129 $136 $136 $149 $187 $216 $229 $100
Arts & Science 118 125 121 130 192 229 247 71
Law 2 104 114 112 141 179 205 213 109
Engineering 3 120 130 141 162 184 225 283 163
Medicine 171 181 176 189 194 235 276 105
Graduate 4 130 130 130 125 184 186 127 —3
1 Adapted from Thurber, Op. Cit., p. 58, with changes and brought up to date.
2 Johns Hopkins University not included.
3 Chicago University not included.
4 Vanderbilt University not included.
Harvard, Columbia, Chicago, Deland-Stanford, Johns Hopkins, Vanderbilt, Cornell, and
Bryn Mawr are included in Arts and Science and Graduate figures.
The Order here is somewhat better than in the case of public institutions.
There is no reason to believe, however, that it is a calculated result. It
is more reasonable to believe that endowments for some branches of learn-
ing have not been forthcoming as abundantly as they have for others.
This is undoubtedly true in some cases and is an unfortunate Situation.
The line-up is encouraging, however, and shows the advantage which
private institutions have over public institutions. Due to the absence of
state politics they are able to initiate sounder financial policies.
If the years prior to 1924-25 are examined, it is found that the
Order is constantly shifting and there is a tendency to conclude that
charges in the different schools are not made on any basis of economic
justice to the individual or to society as a whole. 24 It seems quite obvious
that there has been no improvement in the apportioning of fees and
tuitions within the institution, even in the private universities and Colleges.
No trace of a definite policy involving economic justice can be found.
Fees and Tuitions in Private Institutions in 1924-25
The present fee and tuition schedules in private institutions show
more consistency than those in public institutions, as may be seen in Table
6. There is less difference among institutions and among the various
schools within these institutions. There has evidently been an effort on
the part of each institution to keep within the limits prescribed by other
institutions.
24 Thurber, Op. Cit., p. 62.