EMPLOYMENT PSYCHOLOGY
232
means of mere observation. But can mere observation
gauge the beat of a man’s pulse, or the pressure of his
blood, or the temperature of his body? Can it detect any
one of the hundred and one ailments which may afflict
an individual healthy to all outward appearances? What
should we think of an insurance company which selected
its risks by mere observation, or of an army which selected
its men by giving them only the “once over”? The
physical examination, with its thoroughness, its mechanical
aids, its chemical analysis, is a standing testimony
to the unreliability of observation. To guess correctly
nine times out of ten may be possible, especially to those
who are gifted with the knack. However, an insurance
company which guessed correctly nine times out of ten
would be bankrupt in a very short time. And an army
which made only one mistake in ten would in all probability
break down at the crucial test. Industries, until
recently, have labored along under the economic burden
which their mistakes in this respect imposed on them.
However, there are now signs in the recognition of the importance
of the labor-turnover problem that these mistakes
will not be tolerated much longer.
The phrase, observational method, is used here to mean
making an estimate of an individual on the basis of a
cursory scrutiny of his general appearance and of those
actions which are likely to appear during the characteristic
short employment interview. Naturally, the longer an
observation is continued the more things about an individual
it can include and the more reliable the resulting
judgment will be. But, even prolonged observations are
not necessarily reliable, and it often happens that, after
having known friends for years, we find that we have
not really known them at all. The employment interview