Their Relation to Higher Educational Finance
97
are overdue will eventually be paid in large measure. Sotne institutions
have been successful in collecting money after it has been out for as long
a period as twenty years. The relative proportions between the columns
tabulated above are interesting. The total amount of money overdue in
135 institutions in 1923 was $386,816, which is approximately one-fourth
of $1,634,795, the total amount outstanding. To be exact, 23 per cent.
of the total amount of funds was overdue. This is not surprising when
we consider that most institutions have no systematic method of collect
ing due and overdue accounts. The total amount outstanding ($1,634,795)
is almost double the amount available in one year (1923). In other
words, a sum equal to 57 per cent. of the total amount of funds out
standing was available for the purpose of loans in 1923, which is an
exceedingly high proportion. It means a very favorable turnover in
loans. One-fifth ($944,905) or 20 per cent. of the total amount of funds
originally established ($4,609,088) for the purpose of making loans to
students was available in 1923, which would indicate a turnover approxi
mately every five years. Taking into consideration that some institutions
have been administering their loans very poorly, it means that other
institutions must have been most efficient in order to bring the average
up to this favorable level.
Selecting The Risk
Since the selection of the risk is important in the successful admin-
istration of loans, it is well that this element of Student loans be fully
elaborated here even at the risk of repetition. The supposition is that
Student loans will be administered under the same principles as commer-
cial loans with but a slight change in these principles in order that they
may be applied to the student’s peculiar problem.
No mechanical device can be put forward and no set of rules can be
established to guide those who are to decide which students are to be
granted loans. The proper selection of the risk is something that can
come only as the result of experience in dealing with students. The
student’s present needs, future ability, and willingness to pay are the
deciding factors. His present needs can be determined by the analysis
of his Statement as to his present financial circumstances. His present
income consists of what he is able to receive from home without depriving
other members of his family of a just share of the family income. If
his family is in comfortable circumstances, there is no reason why the
Institution should help him financially. If his family is not able or
is unwilling to assist him, he is then eligible for a loan, provided that his
probable future financial success warrants it. Here lies the difficulty.
His future financial success is hard to estimate, but if a Student has a