178 MODERN MONETARY SYSTEMS
silver écus, which were the only monetary instruments in
the Spanish circulation to have a market value ! And so,
with any monetary system which includes an available
metal circulation, we are accustomed to consider as the
basis of the system or the standard that currency which
gives to the entire monetary system a stable basis for its
monetary relations with foreign countries. This currency is
usually of metal, i.e., gold. Therefore, in practice, we are
right in considering gold as the basis of the system. But in fact
gold only plays this part because, being accepted for free coinage
in a large number of countries, a given weight corresponds
in each of these countries to a given number of monetary units
and because its international circulation makes it possible for
one national monetary unit to be converted into another at a
fairly constant rate.
Therefore this does not mean that the value of these
various national units of account, which are only connected
with each other by the fact of their being convertible into
gold, is determined by gold, and gold is the standard
because it is a commodity; and so the above remarks can
be easily reconciled with the conclusions which we have
reached earlier; and we may deduce from them that an
international fiduciary currency such as notes, which have
currency in several countries, would constitute, as between
those countries and without any support from metal, an
1 This idea has, of course, been known for a long time. It was brought out
in particular by Cernuschi in “La monnaie métallique.” It has usually
been rejected. M. Bourguin, in his work already quoted on “La mesure
de la valeur et la monnaie,” stated that he could not understand how notes
issued in the form of abstract monetary units could fail to be connected
with a definite quantity of commodities. Without disputing that there is
a real truth in M. Bourguin’s remarks, it does not seem to us that the
problem has been quite accurately stated. It is true in our opinion that the
monetary unit was originally connected with a certain quantity of a
commodity; and it would be a curious proceeding to issue notes in a new
monetary unit unconnected with previous units; but we believe that an
analysis of the notion of a standard and of the part played nowadays by
precious metals in determining the value of monetary units shows
logically that the value of such units which was originally determined by
the exchange of precious metal as a commodity and in some sort established
on this historic basis, has continued to develop under the system of free