246
EMPLOYMENT PSYCHOLOGY
certainly not like a capable stenographer. And yet she
picked up a notebook and took down the dictation given
her with a rapidity and assurance that were most convincing.
And when she began transcribing her notes, she
did so with a vigor and confidence that left no mistake as
to her ability. The capability which this girl displayed in
action was entirely out of harmony with her general appearance.
The employment interviewer is usually on the lookout
for actions which will enable him to form a better estimate
of an applicant. Even if he is not consciously looking for
such actions, he is influenced by them nevertheless. The
candidate’s language, his manner of expression, his general
attitude, his walk, and a number of other acts which may
express themselves during the course of an interview, all
play a very important part in the final conclusion. However,
the usual interview is so short as to make it impossible
to watch more than a very few of the applicant’s
activities, and the knowledge of the individual which they
reveal is therefore very superficial and fragmentary. The
most important objection to forming judgments in this
way is the fact that the actions which the candidate reveals
during an interview are in most cases totally irrelevant;
that is, they are actions which have little or nothing
to do with the work for which the candidate is applying.
An applicant for the position of tool maker, for instance,
may stutter his replies and act very awkwardly during an
interview, thus producing a very unfavorable impression
on the interviewer. However, his clumsy actions in this
respect are no reliable indication of his ability as a tool
maker. The lack of activity and -alertness which the girl
just described manifested while she was being interviewed
was not a good indication of the energy and ability