MAJORITY REPORT.
members of any one society being widely scattered throughout
the country, to drawbacks of organisation and ‘‘ to the general
paucity of demand under present conditions for such services ”’
(Ministry of Health, App. I, B, 210). The usual financial
arrangement between the Societies and the Nursing Organisa-
tions provides for payment being made at the rate of 1s. 4d. per
visit, of which the Society pays ls. and the member 4d. We
have received professional evidence from the Queen Victoria's
Jubilee Institute for Nurses (App. LXXII) and the College of
Nursing (App. LXXIII), the former being engaged in the
practical work of providing nurses throughout the country, and
the latter in the promotion of the better education and training
of nurses and in watching their professional interests.
98. The Queen Victoria’s Jubilee Institute points out that
** there is already in existence a national service which can and
does provide skilled nursing for all kinds of illnesses at an
economical rate and under proper safeguards—a service which,
though not completely covering the country, is capable of being
made to do s0,”’ and urges ‘‘ that nursing should be provided for
all insured persons, and that in doing so advantage should be
taken of the existing organisations.”” (App. LXXII, 16.) The
rates of payment arranged between the Institute and numerous
Approved Societies is 1s. 4d. a visit for the first 30 visits, and
thereafter not more than 5s. a week, and 5s. for a nurse’s attend-
ance at an operation. In some cases the Society pays the full
amount, in others it pays 1s. and leaves the Nursing Association
to collect the balance from the insured person.
99. The witnesses who appeared on behalf of the College of
Nursing also suggested the need for a wide extension of
the nursing service of insured persons in place of the present
additional benefit arrangements, which they characterise as
‘‘ inequitable, fragmentary and wholly inadequate.” (App.
LXXIIIL, 9.) In fact, they ** urge the provision of a statutory
nursing benefit complemental to medical benefit” (App.
LXXIII, 3 and 15), and suggest that a sum of 1s. per insured
person per annum would go far to provide the requisite finance
for this complete service. (App. LXXIII. 14.)
100. The Ministry of Health representative makes the follow-
ing comments: —*‘ The ground is already to a considerable
extent covered by the District Nursing Associations, particularly
in urban areas. . . . . By undertaking the provision (i.e.,
as an additional benefit) you are not adding very much really to
what the patient can get or what they would otherwise get.”
(Smith Whitaker, Q. 23,968.) ‘If you were proposing to pro-
vide a nursing service for the whole community you might take
over the whole of their (the Nursing Associations’) organisation
and develop it, but if you are going to provide nursing for a section
of the community vou cannot do it better than by